Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rudy Meron's avatar

Building internet usage from the ground up in Africa requires displacing zero usage, not just competing for current users. A free, downlink-only satellite model using compressed, valuable content delivered to phones via local Wi-Fi is a low-cost, high-impact way to close the usage gap.

It’s not about replacing mobile or fiber—it’s about priming a generation of users to value being online.

Companies can build up internet usage organically—especially in underconnected markets—by deploying free downlink-only satellite services that deliver high-value, zero-rated content like Wikipedia, educational videos, health information, and farming resources. This strategy addresses the demand-side usage gap by building habitual, low-barrier use cases that cultivate digital literacy and perceived value before attempting full monetization. Analytics Layer

Offline logging of usage to understand content demand patterns and gauge when to go to market accurately. Bridge to Full Internet

After trust/value built, upsell affordable uplink services (shared hotspots, vouchers)

Play the Public good angle with the spillovers (education, health), don’t mention the long-term monetizable behavior and bet there’s a line of climate fund types begging to foot the bill…

Rudy Meron's avatar

The article “Can Satellite Internet Close Africa’s Connectivity Gap?” presents a technically sound investment thesis but asks the wrong primary question—“Can satellite internet expand connectivity?”—when the more pressing economic question is: “Why do so many people who already have mobile access still not use the internet?”

The Wrong Framing

The article focuses on:

Affordability of hardware and subscription for satellite services

Regulatory barriers

Investor strategies and market entry

Performance advantages over existing ISPs

But this lens misses the deeper structural issue: internet usage is not constrained primarily by access, but by effective demand.

The Core Economic Reality

Based on 2023 ITU data:

63% of Africans own a mobile phone

Only 37% use the internet

That’s a 26-point gap between access and usage—in economic terms, a massive underutilization of already-installed capacity.

This suggests:

The constraint is not network coverage, but non-price barriers such as:

Digital literacy

Language and content relevance

Trust and perceived value

Local service quality

Cost of mobile data relative to income

In that context, satellite internet is:

Not addressing the main bottleneck

Not solving the usage gap

Targeting affluent early adopters in thin markets

The Better Questions to Ask

Instead of “Can Starlink scale?” investors and policymakers should ask:

Why are most mobile phone owners not online?

What does it take to convert ownership into productive digital participation?

How can satellite service models address demand-side frictions, not just supply-side gaps?

What are the unit economics of serving populations who don’t even use the cheaper mobile internet?

Summary

The article is supply-driven in its assumptions. But in Africa’s digital economy, the binding constraint is not infrastructure—it’s demand activation. Satellite broadband solves a problem for elites and edge cases, not for the median African.

Unless satellite providers design models that close the usage gap, they risk replicating the same asymmetry mobile networks face: wide ownership, low utility, and minimal inclusive growth.

The better opportunity lies in solving the “63% phone, 37% internet” paradox—not just adding more satellites.

No posts

Ready for more?